View Full Version : Interesting Price Comparison Merc Vs Hudson
nhp1127
03-01-2009, 08:05 PM
Saw this on e-bay. I thought it drew an interesting comparison to the Hudson.
http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/Cars-Trucks___1949-Mercury-Cp_W0QQitemZ270347649816QQddnZCarsQ20Q26Q20TrucksQ QddiZ2282QQcmdZViewItemQQptZUS_Cars_Trucks?hash=it em270347649816&_trksid=p4506.c0.m245&_trkparms=72%3A317%7C65%3A12%7C39%3A1%7C240%3A1308
Don C. Mozynski
03-01-2009, 10:25 PM
That roofline looks much too high.
46HudsonPU
03-02-2009, 06:58 AM
Side-by-side comparison - That Merc, vs. Bill's '49 that is for sale...
http://i13.ebayimg.com/05/i/001/34/43/1d42_1.JPG
http://www.classiccar.com/files/BA_1561.JPG
IMO - Regardless of paint job, condition, etc., there is NO contest... Just look at those lines - Hudson wins, hands down!
(And Bill's price is $1,000 less than the BIN than the Mercury on eBay...).
rpmonroe
03-02-2009, 08:13 AM
Well now that's just not fair Rick---shame on you!
rpmonroe
03-02-2009, 08:16 AM
Man those Merc nuts shure go through a lot of cash, effort and needless time to make those old slugs look like a Hud don't they?
Aaron D. IL
03-02-2009, 09:57 AM
Remarkable how much many Ford products look like Hudson frrom 1939-'51
Clutch guy
03-02-2009, 10:04 AM
FoMoCo was good at more than just a few things!. Read about it in a different manufacturers literature today,FMC showroom next model year??.:rolleyes:;) Bang for the buck was invented!
RL Chilton
03-02-2009, 09:18 PM
Rick-
Couldn't have said it better myself. You're right on the money, pal!
ArkieJazz
03-03-2009, 12:13 AM
Those Mercs were junk from day one.
vBulletin® v3.8.3, Copyright ©2000-2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.